
State sues Accenture for data loss
Connecticut has sued its computer consultancy for negligence over data loss.
CONNECTICUT – US State Connecticut has sued its own computer consultancy Accenture for undisclosed damages over the loss of nearly 460 state-agency bank account numbers and personnel data of 58 individuals. Connecticut attorney general Richard Blumenthal announced that he is suing the company for illegal negligence, unauthorized use of state property, and breach of contract.
A computer backup tape stolen in Ohio contained confidential data copied by Accenture and taken out of state in violation of its $98 million contract. An Accenture employee is believed to have violated company security rules by transferring the data to Ohio, where the consultancy is developing a similar financial data system to the one it produced for Connecticut. The theft was possible because of Ohio's low-tech system of data protection.
Accenture is conducting its own review of the incident and released a statement: “Based on what we know today, we believe that our policies were inadvertently not followed," the statement read. “We intend to take appropriate actions with any individuals involved and to reinforce with all of our employees, as we do on a regular basis, the importance of following our privacy and data protection policies.”
Although Comptroller Nancy Wyman was keen to point out that Connecticut's data is backed up nightly on computer at the University of Connecticut, a private vendor securing copies and safeguarding data for banks and insurance companies, the full ramifications of the theft have yet to be realised.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European Commission changes tune on proposed FRTB multiplier
Banks fear departure from original diversification factor undermines case for permanent relief
Supervisors should be mindful of geopolitical risks, says IMF
Shock events cause sizeable swings in asset pricing, institution’s latest report highlights
Bowman won’t commit to stress-testing the tariff shock
Nominated Fed vice-chair stonewalls calls to run ad hoc scenario similar to 2020 Covid test
Fed’s Bowman to ‘prioritise’ SLR exemption for US Treasuries
Reinstating Covid-era relief is a ‘no brainer’, dealers say, as bond markets reel from tariff chaos
SEC’s Peirce calls for rethink of international standards
Risk Live Boston: regulator rejects international calls for bank-like regulation of investors
Tariff turbulence piles pressure on banks’ VAR models
Backtesting breaches start to mount, but too early to tell if regulatory intervention needed
Trading desks want regulators to face down the NMRF monster
Rule-makers in Australia and the European Union are open to changes to the unpopular FRTB test
CFTC’s Doge-inspired drive to enforcement may fall short
Lawyers doubt guidance on rewards for self-reporting goes far enough