Apra denies 8% Tier 1 capital claims
Australian regulator Apra has rejected claims it set an 8% Tier 1 capital ratio requirement
SYDNEY - The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Apra) has refuted media reports that it has set a minimum ratio of 8% for Tier 1 capital ratios for banks and other deposit-taking institutions (ADIs). The Australian regulator issued the statement on its website.
Australia implemented Basel II on January 1 2008. Apra says under that framework, ADIs are subject to an 8% prudential capital ratio (PCR) of total risk-weighted assets. Half of that may comprise other forms of capital - such as Tier 2, Tier 3 or 'hybrid' capital, and requiring 4% minimum as 'core' Tier 1.
The Apra statement says: "Apra can, and does, set PCRs for individual institutions at levels above 8%, to ensure that minimum capital requirements for an ADI are consistent with its overall risk profile. PCRs for individual institutions are not published."
Apra maintains Australian banks and ADIs are fulfilling their capital adequacy requirements and the sector is sound and well-capitalised.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
