FSA fines Merrill Lynch Intl
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Merrill Lynch International £150,000 for inaccurate transaction reports to the FSA and the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA).
The FSA alleged that between September 1996 and January 2006, Merrill Lynch incorrectly reported an estimated 1.2 million transactions in non-UK European equities.
Merrill's questionable transactions showed the firm's status as 'agent' rather than 'principal', because the transaction reporting system was set to report trades from the client's perspective rather than the firm's, according to the FSA.
Merrill only spotted the error in the transaction reporting system in December 2005. This was despite the broker-dealer's increased focus on transaction reporting issues following a private warning from the FSA in November 2002, and subsequent discussions with the FSA about certain transactions in 2004 and 2005.
The broker-dealer violated rule 5.49 of the SFA, which requires a firm to supply the SFA with details about the investment transactions it effects.
In imposing the financial penalty, the FSA took into account relevant factors, including the fact that Merrill acted proactively in reporting the failure to the regulator and that the reporting failure was not deliberate or reckless.
Merrill Lynch reported the transaction failures to the FSA in January 2006, and has co-operated fully with the FSA's investigation.
The firm completed a systems change to correct the error, and has revised the testing mandate to include all mandatory fields.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact