FSA letter warns mortgage firms to treat customers fairly
Mortgage firms asked to review arrears and repossessions practice by UK regulator
The letter is the second warning to lenders from the FSA in recent months. It comes in light of its earlier review which found weaknesses in arrears and repossessions handling, particularly in the impaired credit sector of the market, and the fact that increasing numbers of households are at risk of repossession.
"Conditions in the mortgage market are difficult and it seems likely that these conditions will persist for some time," says Jon Pain, FSA retail managing director. "In such a challenging operating environment, it is particularly important for senior management to ensure the fair treatment of customers, including when they go into arrears."
"The fair treatment of consumers in arrears will continue to be a priority for the FSA throughout 2009. Where we find that lenders are not complying with our requirements we will make appropriate and properly targeted use of our existing regulatory tools, which may include enforcement action," he added.
The letter states that the FSA expects the senior management of mortgage lenders and administrators to critically review current arrears policy; critically review current management practices and procedures; and assess whether, in practice, borrowers in arrears are being treated fairly by initiating a review of a sample of cases to assess whether the FSA's requirements are being met.
The FSA expects firms to address any weaknesses as a matter of urgency and chief executives must communicate conclusions and any actions the firm proposes to take to the FSA by January 31, 2009.
Click here for the letter
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion