![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
FSA Wins Winterflood market abuse case
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has won its market abuse case against Winterflood, a market-maker in alternative investment market (AIM) securities. The case was launched through the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal against Winterflood and two of its traders, Stephen Sotiriou and Jason Robins. The regulator said the trades executed by the firm should have been flagged as unusual but, rather than take proper steps to check out their trades' credentials, the firm continued to trade them, leading to profits of £900,000 - its single most profitable stock at the time.
Winterflood, already fined £4 million by the regulator, had appealed against the decision last year (see OpRisk & Compliance, August 2008, page 6), while the FSA has fined Sotiriou and Robins £200,000 and £50,000 respectively. The firm misused and delayed rollovers to distort AIM-listed Fundamental-E Investments (FEI) share prices, manipulating the market for six months of 2004. In June 2008, the FSA found that Winterflood and the traders had played a crucial role in an illegal share ramping scheme relating to FEI. Winterflood did not challenge the FSA's findings but is now understood to be seeking permission to appeal - along with the two traders - through the Court of Appeal.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Cool heads must guide financial regulation of climate risk
Supervisors can’t simply rely on ‘magical thinking’ of market discipline, says Sergio Scandizzo
Markets worry EU’s reporting simplification will add to burden
Rather than reducing firms’ obligations, market participants fear it could end up increasing requirements
EU banks show basic instinct for credit valuation adjustments
Simpler approach to CVA appeals even to some already using more complex models for counterparty risk
Bank of England wants dynamic Emir for UK clearing houses
Review won’t just photocopy EU legislation, as BoE seeks to make rules simpler and adaptable
Big banks could be sidelined from future rescue deals – FSB
Exacerbation of too-big-to-fail means G-Sibs could already be too large to take extra assets
More guidance, less enforcement: the SEC under Paul Atkins
Current and former insiders expect clearer crypto rules and an end to regulatory violation sweeps
During Trump turbulence, value-at-risk may go pop
Trading risk models have been trained in quiet markets, and volatility is now looming
Bank of England mustering unit to model system-wide stresses
Permanent team at UK supervisor will work on buy- and sell-side interactions