NYSE firm fined for illegal broker payments
NEW YORK – Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC ("VDM"), an NYSE member firm, has been fined $3.5 million for illegally compensating unregistered brokers or finders, NYSE Regulation has said.
The firm's stock loan department has since been closed for the supervisory deficiencies and books and records violations that led to the misconduct. NYSE Regulation alleges that the firm's stock loan department engaged in numerous transactions at away-from-market rebate rates, and made payments to finders who performed no legitimate business function.
VDM completely lacked supervision of its stock loan business resulting in millions of dollars in fees being improperly channelled to finders who did nothing to earn them, according to Susan L. Merrill, chief of enforcement at NYSE Regulation. "Firms must ensure that services are being engaged for bona fide business purposes, and must have independent controls to verify that services paid for have actually been performed," she said.
NYSE Regulation charges that from January through December 2004, the employees of VDM's stock loan department borrowed securities from complicit counterparties at rebate rates significantly below the prevailing market rebate rates for those securities, and then loaned those securities to third parties at higher rebate rates including market rates.
The difference between the below-market rates at which the securities were borrowed and the higher rates at which the securities were loaned represented the firm's gross revenues on these transactions. These actions violate Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 thereunder, and NYSE Rules 342, 440 and 476(a)(6).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising