Patriot Act due diligence rules finalised
Section 312 demands closer AML inspection of foreign banks
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued final rules mandating enhanced risk-based due diligence requirements for US institutions in their relationships with certain foreign banks.
Under the new rules clarifying and finalising Section 312 of the US Patriot Act, US financial institutions must identify the owners of potentially suspect foreign banks if they are not publicly traded and ascertain whether such banks provide correspondent accounts to other foreign banks, thereby providing them with access to the US financial system.
The new provision also mandates that, in making their risk assessments, financial institutions should consider the nature of a foreign bank’s business, available information on the foreign bank’s anti-money laundering (AML) record, and information on the nature of the foreign supervisory regulations under which the bank is operating.
Section 312 of the controversial Patriot Act requires US financial institutions to perform due diligence, and in some cases enhanced due diligence, regarding accounts established for foreign financial institutions and private banking accounts established for non-US nationals.
The final rule applies to the accounts of a small category of foreign banks, including those with offshore banking licences, and certain high-risk banks subject to international or US Treasury determinations.
“As international anti-money laundering standards improve globally, risk assessments for foreign banks should become easier to conduct. Common standards are increasingly protecting both sides of the international relationship and US banks can take comfort in the fidelity of their foreign customers while foreign banks will find it easier to process their US transactions,” says James Freis, director of FinCEN.
The final rule completes the implementation of Section 312, following a lengthy consultation period on appropriate due diligence requirements for the banking activities of non-US persons.
The changes to Section 312 are effective from September 10, 2007. Enhanced due diligence requirements are set to apply from February 5, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements