Credit Suisse hit with £5.6m fine
Systems and controls failings warrant a multimillion-pound fine from the FSA
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined the UK operations of Credit Suisse £5.6 million for breaching FSA Principles 2 and 3 by failing to conduct their business with due skill, care and diligence, and failing to organise and control their business effectively.
Credit Suisse released its financial results for 2007 on February 12 this year. On February 19, Credit Suisse announced that it had identified mismarking and pricing errors by a small number of traders and that it was repricing certain asset-backed securities. The re-pricing involved a writedown of revenues by $2.65 billion.
The breaches related to the pricing of certain asset-backed securities held by the structured credit group (SCG) within Credit Suisse’s investment banking division. The SCG specialises in complex, high-risk structured products.
FSA Principle 2 states that “a firm must conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence,” while FSA Principle 3 states that “a firm must take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems”. Credit Suisse has been fined for breaching both principles. According to the FSA: “In breach of Principle 2, the [Credit Suisse] subsidiaries failed adequately to supervise the business of the SCG and did not act in a timely way on the concerns they had identified about the pricing of certain asset-backed positions”.
And, “in breach of Principle 3, adequate systems and controls were not put in place by the subsidiaries, which meant that they failed to recognise, for approximately five months, that certain of the SCG’s asset-backed positions were wrongly valued”.
“The penalty reflects our tougher stance on enforcement and our policy of imposing higher penalties to achieve credible deterrence,” says Margaret Cole, director of enforcement at the FSA. “It is imperative, particularly in more challenging financial conditions, that firms have in place appropriate systems and controls to manage their risks. The subsidiaries here failed to take appropriate steps to control the potentially high-risk combination in the structured credit group’s holdings of exotic products, opaque valuations and high leverage.
“The sudden and unexpected announcement of the writedown had the potential to undermine market confidence.”
The subsidiaries co-operated fully with the FSA and agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA’s investigation. As such, they have qualified for a discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme, which the fine of £5.6 million reflects.
Credit Suisse commissioned a detailed review of the causes of the writedown, which identified serious failures in the subsidiaries’ controls over the SCG, and the operation and management of those controls, and concluded they were not effective. Senior management accepted the findings of the review and a comprehensive remedial programme is under way.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say