
US securities regulator extends emergency short-selling order
SEC extends emergency short-selling order to August 12 and indicates more permanent rulemaking will follow
WASHINGTON, DC – The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has extended an emergency order issued on July 15 designed to enhance investor protection against naked short selling in the securities of financial institutions to which the Federal Reserve has granted temporary access to liquidity facilities. The extended order will be in effect until 11:59 pm EDT on August 12, 2008, and will not be further extended.
The decision to extend the order for a second 10-day period, in addition to furthering the purposes of the original order, will allow staff to collect and analyse additional data on the effect of the order's provisions, says the SEC. After the extended order expires, the commission has indicated it will move to consider rulemaking to provide additional protection against abusive naked short selling in the broader market, while allowing the legitimate short selling essential to efficient, highly liquid markets.The SEC’s order requires short sellers in the securities of the designated institutions to arrange to borrow the securities at the time of sale so the buyers will receive the stock they purchased on time. Selling short without borrowing the stock to be sold, and failing to deliver it, is called naked short selling.
“The order is designed to protect legitimate short selling in these securities, but helps prevent illegitimate naked short selling and potential ‘distort and short’ manipulation,” says SEC chairman Christopher Cox. “In addition to continuing the existing order against naked short selling, the Commission will continue exploring other remedies for the broader marketplace to further protect investors from ‘distort and short’ artists.”
The move has angered industry commentators. Edward Yingling, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association (ABA), says: “We are disappointed and deeply concerned about the decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission to extend the emergency order banning the short selling of 19 financial stocks without including all publicly traded banks.
“ABA is concerned that those market participants that are actively involved in executing short-selling strategies will focus their naked short-selling strategies on the publicly traded banks and bank holding companies not covered by the order. As the Commission is aware, it would be an understatement to say that short interest in financial services companies has greatly increased over the past year. Without such action to include bank stocks in the ban, the potential exists that the Commission’s action could backfire and disrupt an industry that is essential to the functioning of the economy.”
He adds: “We hope that the Commission will revisit the matter following the expiration of the emergency order on August 12 when it proceeds to the consideration of rulemaking.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Delving into the European Commission’s proposed overhaul of FRTB
Raft of potential changes would benefit both IMA and SA banks – but only temporarily
Why the survival of internal models is vital for financial stability
Risk quants say stampede to standardised approaches heightens herding and systemic risks
Crypto custody a bit(coin) closer after US accounting U-turn
Federal banking supervisors expected to eventually relax regimes for safeguarding digital assets
Japan’s regulator stands firm behind Basel as peers buckle
Japanese banks fear being at a disadvantage to rivals as Basel III implementation falters
EU racing to comply with active account rules
Industry wants simpler route to exemptions ahead of ‘challenging’ deadline for new clearing regime
CFTC acting chair: ‘We don’t need a Dodd-Frank for crypto’
US regulator wants real-time market surveillance; focuses on rise of liquidity risk
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues
Basel uniformity fades as members defy dress code
Rule-makers diverge from Basel III standards, denting aims of comparability and fuelling fears over fair competition