Solvency II passed without group support
Industry associations respond to the passing of the EU's new insurance directive
BRUSSELS - The European Parliament has agreed to pass the Solvency II directive without the group support regime. Group support, which was successfully opposed by the European Council of Ministers, was designed to address home-host capital allocation and cross-border supervision of Europe's systemically important cross-border insurance groups.
The Parliament approved the equity duration dampener demanded by the Council, along with almost all of the Council's other demands. It agreed to discuss group support and the equity dampener again in 2015, in response to fears the dampener will increase national protectionism.
There has been intense political pressure to formalise a Solvency II framework before the cessation of parliament and the European election season this summer. The compromise reached has received a mixed response from insurance industry bodies. The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said the legislation would produce better risk-based supervision in Europe but decried the failure of group support.
"We are very disappointed that an opportunity has been missed to enhance the regulation of groups that operate across borders," says Stephen Haddrill, director-general at ABI based in London. "Capital requirements will still be set in each country a firm operates in, and not set centrally by their lead supervisor. The crisis has shown that the lead supervisor for a firm needs to look across boundaries and ensure risks across the group are properly managed and capitalised as a whole."
The European Insurance Federation (CEA) also registered its disappointment at the group support carve-out - noting the importance of effective group support in the systemic risk supervision proposals released in February's Larosière report - but reflected general relief that the directive had passed in some form rather than not at all.
"This is a decisive step towards the new, enhanced regulatory regime that we have been seeking for Europe's insurers," says Michaela Koller, director-general at CEA in Brussels. "We are happy that the timetable for implementing the directive is on track. Solvency II is an important and timely piece of legislation and any delay would have been most unfortunate in the current economic climate."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow