UK to regulate City bonuses
Regulator initiates process of discussion to address remuneration issues
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has released a ‘Dear CEO’ missive explaining its new requirements regarding bonuses at investment banks and financial firms. Although the letter says it is difficult to regulate without being overly prescriptive, the regulator expects firms to develop structures to effectively monitor their remuneration policy – and wed it to risk management.
The FSA says it is addressing “widespread concern” over the link between remuneration cultures and the global financial crisis. It says its recommendations are in line with the April 2008 recommendations from the Financial Stability Forum, the International Institute of Finance and the Counterparty Risk Management Group.
The FSA’s letter says: “During September, the FSA held a number of high-level discussions with London-based firms about remuneration policies. Between now and the end of the year we will arrange a further round of visits to all recipients of this letter. Our aim will be to gather more specific information about remuneration practices in your firm to assure bad practices are not present and to seek further input on what would constitute good practice.”
Examples of bad practice include bonuses calculated on the basis of revenues without any counterbalancing risk controls, performance assessed entirely on the results for the current financial year, and remuneration paid solely in cash.
The FSA says its letter does not constitute formal regulation, but an ongoing process of discussion. The results of this work are due in early 2009.
To read the letter and its recommendations for good practice click the link below.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities