Paulson pitches rescue deal to House committee
Regulators in for a tough ride when they pitch the Paulson Plan to the House Financial Services Committee
WASHINGTON, DC – US Treasury secretary Henry Paulson and chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke will present their solution to the recent financial crisis – the Troubled Asset Relief Programme, also dubbed the Paulson Plan – to the House Financial Services Committee later today.
The regulators fielded tough questions on the bailout plan from the Senate Banking Committee yesterday over concerns regarding its implications for taxpayers and homeowners, but today’s hearing is predicted to be much more hostile. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, agrees action should be taken, but wants to make banks pay for their mistakes. He wants to save homeowners by allowing bankruptcy judges to force lenders to change the terms of mortgages on primary residences, while punishing banks by legislating on executive pay.
An issue likely to emerge again today is the inclusion of warrants in the plan that would convert Treasury investment in illiquid assets into equity in the companies helped. Yesterday Paulson stated this would not be advisable because he believed it would limit participation in the programme, causing it to fail in its aim of getting the market moving again.
The issue of legislating on executives’ pay, which both US presidential candidates have called for, might be a sticking point that Congress will need to reach a compromise on.
The call for regulation of the $58 trillion credit default swaps market by members of the Senate committee is also likely to be echoed today.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB IMA
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements
Republican SEC may focus on fixed income – Peirce
Commissioner also wants a revival of finders’ exemption, more guidance for UST clearing
Streamlining shareholding disclosure compliance
Shareholding disclosure compliance is increasingly complex due to a global patchwork of regulations and the challenge of managing vast amounts of data
Banks take aim at Gruenberg’s brokered deposit rule
Regulatory lawyers question need to reverse 2020 rulemaking just four years later