SEC moves to reduce reliance on credit ratings
US regulator proposes changes to clarify credit ratings for investors
WASHINGTON, DC – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rule changes that clarify the limits and purpose of credit ratings for investors. This is the third set of proposals issued by the SEC for public comment concerning rating agency reform, aiming to bring increased transparency to the credit ratings process and curb practices that contributed to recent turmoil in the credit markets.
“This action is designed to ensure that the role we assign to ratings in our rules is consistent with the objective of having investors make an independent judgement of the risks associated with a particular security,” says SEC chairman Christopher Cox. “It should be neither the purpose nor the effect of any SEC rule to discourage investors from paying close attention to what credit ratings actually mean.”
Erik Sirri, director of the SEC's trading and markets division, says: “These proposals complete the rulemaking initiative begun two weeks ago with respect to NRSROs [nationally recognised statistical rating organisations]. I believe the proposed amendments will further promote the Commission's goals of strengthening the ratings process by reducing any undue reliance on NRSRO ratings and by encouraging independent evaluation and analysis of credit risk.”
John White, director of the SEC's corporation finance division, adds: “These proposals are an important step towards clarifying the appropriate role of credit ratings in investors' decisions about the securities in which they invest. Not only do the proposals establish new criteria, independent of ratings, for issuers to access our forms and utilize the shelf registration process, they do so in a manner that protects the interests of investors.”
Consistent with recent recommendations issued by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, the Financial Stability Forum, and the Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (Iosco), the SEC has considered whether the inclusion of requirements related to ratings in its rules and forms has, in effect, placed an ‘official seal of approval’ on ratings that could adversely affect the quality of due diligence and investment analysis. The new proposals aim to reduce such undue reliance and result in improvements in the analysis that underlies investment decisions.
The deadline for public comments for the third set of proposed rules is September 5, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising