SEC moves to reduce reliance on credit ratings
US regulator proposes changes to clarify credit ratings for investors
WASHINGTON, DC – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rule changes that clarify the limits and purpose of credit ratings for investors. This is the third set of proposals issued by the SEC for public comment concerning rating agency reform, aiming to bring increased transparency to the credit ratings process and curb practices that contributed to recent turmoil in the credit markets.
“This action is designed to ensure that the role we assign to ratings in our rules is consistent with the objective of having investors make an independent judgement of the risks associated with a particular security,” says SEC chairman Christopher Cox. “It should be neither the purpose nor the effect of any SEC rule to discourage investors from paying close attention to what credit ratings actually mean.”
Erik Sirri, director of the SEC's trading and markets division, says: “These proposals complete the rulemaking initiative begun two weeks ago with respect to NRSROs [nationally recognised statistical rating organisations]. I believe the proposed amendments will further promote the Commission's goals of strengthening the ratings process by reducing any undue reliance on NRSRO ratings and by encouraging independent evaluation and analysis of credit risk.”
John White, director of the SEC's corporation finance division, adds: “These proposals are an important step towards clarifying the appropriate role of credit ratings in investors' decisions about the securities in which they invest. Not only do the proposals establish new criteria, independent of ratings, for issuers to access our forms and utilize the shelf registration process, they do so in a manner that protects the interests of investors.”
Consistent with recent recommendations issued by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, the Financial Stability Forum, and the Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (Iosco), the SEC has considered whether the inclusion of requirements related to ratings in its rules and forms has, in effect, placed an ‘official seal of approval’ on ratings that could adversely affect the quality of due diligence and investment analysis. The new proposals aim to reduce such undue reliance and result in improvements in the analysis that underlies investment decisions.
The deadline for public comments for the third set of proposed rules is September 5, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements