RBS and Man admit exposure to $50 billion Madoff fraud
The Madoff pyramid scheme fraud continues to claim new counterparty victims
RBS has announced its potential loss will amount to about £400 million. Man Group has invested around $360 million through its RMF institutional fund business, which equates to 0.5% of the firm's total funds.
Madoff, a former chairman of the New York Nasdaq stock market, was arrested last week and charged with alleged fraud. Madoff's hedge fund allegedly ran up $50 billion of fraudulent losses - making the fraud the largest of its kind.
The list of counterparties already admitting exposure includes French bank BNP Paribas, Japanese bank Nomura and Spanish banks BBVA and Santander group, which owns UK banks Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley. Santander alone said it had invested $3.1 billion through one of its funds in Madoff's pyramid swindle.
Accusations against US regulators of systemic failure have already begun in the relatively unregulated hedge fund industry. It has been revealed US regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had not investigated Madoff's activities since he registered his fund in 2006. The SEC says Madoff has now confessed there is "no innocent explanation" for his behaviour and he had "paid investors with money that wasn't there".
The incident increases the probability of a regulatory backlash as the new Obama administration prepares to take the political reins in Washington, while the hedge fund industry continues to reel from losses incurred over the past 12 months.
The international Hedge Fund Standards Board, which was formed in January 2008 to take forward the work started by the Hedge Fund Working Group to further best practice standards in the industry, was quick to point out the need for the industry to get serious about implementing robust governance standards.
"The Madoff scandal highlights just how important it is to have independence of process in relation to administration of the fund and valuation," says Antonio Borges, chairman of the Hedge Fund Standards Board. "It also highlights the need for robust governance practices and oversight through independent boards, which will challenge management procedures and behaviour. The hedge fund standards are designed to address exactly these issues, to help prevent such events from happening, and to provide investors with the necessary transparency. This is why an increasing number of managers are signing up to the HFSB standards."
While it is too early to quantify the possible legal fallout among affected counterparties, industry practitioners are already saying operational risk managers are increasingly being called in to fight the fires, along with their legal, anti-fraud and audit colleagues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements