Performance-Based Fees, Incentives and Dynamic Tracking Error Choice
Introduction
A Primer on Portfolio Theory
Application in Mean–Variance Investing
Diversification
Frictional Costs of Diversification
Risk Parity
Incorporating Deviations from Normality: Lower Partial Moments
Portfolio Resampling and Estimation Error
Robust Portfolio Optimisation and Estimation Error
Bayesian Analysis and Portfolio Choice
Testing Portfolio Construction Methodologies Out-of-Sample
Portfolio Construction with Transaction Costs
Portfolio Optimisation with Options: From the Static Replication of CPPI Strategies to a More General Framework
Scenario Optimisation
Core–Satellite Investing: Budgeting Active Manager Risk
Benchmark-Relative Optimisation
Removing Long-Only Constraints: 120/20 Investing
Performance-Based Fees, Incentives and Dynamic Tracking Error Choice
Long-Term Portfolio Choice
Risk Management for Asset-Management Companies
Valuation of Asset Management Firms
Tail Risk Hedging
Mutual funds and corporate pension funds are increasingly using incentive fees, or performance-based fees (PBFs), to reward their fund managers. Janus Capital Group Inc established performance incentives for the managers of 13 of its 59 funds in September 2005. Vanguard and Fidelity are just another two examples of investment companies that use incentive fees. Even in the absence of explicit performance-based fees, Brown et al (1996) and Chevalier and Ellison (1997) have shown that an implicit performance-based compensation structure arises from proportional fees as a result of the fact that net investment flows into funds respond strongly to recent performance.
The effects of performance-based fees on investment decisions have been documented in a number of papers. Grinblatt and Titman (1989) apply option pricing theory to analyse the manager’s risk incentives in a single-stage framework. They find that improperly designed PBF contracts create incentives for gaming by varying the risk of the fund. Carpenter (2000) examines the optimal dynamic investment policy for a risk-averse fund manager and finds that the convexity of the option-like compensation structure can lead the
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net