Esma faces tough task in implementing Emir 3.0
EU regulator must contend with tight timeframes and increasing workload without additional resources
Trilogue negotiators might be patting themselves on the back for finally coming to an agreement on the latest iteration of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, known as Emir 3.0, but for one EU regulator the real work is just about to begin.
As part of the regulatory package, the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma) has been handed a litany of tasks littered with hurdles, but with no additional resources to carry them out.
The regulator has been given six months following Emir 3.0 entering into force to come up with draft regulatory technical standards that set out the active accounts’ thresholds – ultimately determining how much euro-denominated derivatives clearing is relocated to the bloc.
As EU commissioner Mairead McGuiness’s regulatory equivalence deadline for UK clearing houses remains as June 30, 2025, it may leave firms little time to prepare for the requirements coming into force.
Considering also that the final text has yet to receive approval from the European Parliament and Council before entering the EU’s Official Journal and being translated into the bloc’s 24 languages, June next year is ambitious.
If EU regulators were to decide that Esma needs more time to calibrate the thresholds, it would require a change to a level one text – essentially repeating the process that has just taken place to agree the Emir 3.0 text. Such an amendment is made even more unlikely given the EU is about to elect a new parliament and commission, which could make reaching a consensus even more difficult.
After that six-month period to calibrate the active account requirement, Esma will have a further 12 months to evaluate whether the regulation has been successful in reducing European firms’ exposures to systemically important tier-two clearing houses, such as the London branch of LCH and Ice Clear Europe.
What’s unclear is how Esma should measure this effectiveness goal. The trilogue text didn’t define what effectiveness means, so it will be up to Esma to create some sort of metric to evaluate the progress of the regulation.
As part of the joint monitoring mechanism, which includes the European System of Central Banks and the European Systemic Risk Board, Esma will also be responsible for overseeing the development of the active accounts requirement in the EU.
Esma will provide a report to the commission on the progress of the regulation, accompanied by an impact assessment and a cost-benefit analysis. Based on that report, the EC may then decide to introduce a new legislative proposal.
All of this must be done without an increase in funding to manage the regulator’s ongoing supervisory powers, as well as its new responsibilities.
How this all will play into the overall timeline for the roll-out of Emir 3.0 is yet to be seen, but Esma will have its work cut out to keep up.
Editing by Lukas Becker
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Can history resolve factor investors’ p-hacking questions?
Quants seek reassurance in the far distant past
Insurance double-hatters like Apollo can expect more scrutiny
Regulators are homing in on conflicts of interests at private-equity-owned insurers
Podcast: Lorenzo Ravagli on why the skew is for the many
JP Morgan quant proposes a unified framework for trading the volatility skew premium
Quants see promise in DeBerta’s untangled reading
Improved language models are able to grasp context better
Counterparty risk model links defaults to portfolio values
Fed’s Michael Pykhtin proposes using copula models to capture effects of margin calls on default risk
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
Is JSCC-CFTC stalemate about to be broken?
Japan CCP gains allies in battle to clear yen swaps for US clients, but CFTC shakeup could dash hopes
What T+1 risk? Dealers shake off FX concerns
Predictions of increased settlement risk and later-in-the-day trading have yet to materialise