From prophets to ‘parasites’
How post-trade vendors went from problem-solvers to ‘rent-seekers’
Today’s financial markets are stuffed to the gills with would-be innovators and disruptors – many of them former bankers with a new passion for moving fast, breaking things and shaving every other day.
There’s a lesson for them all in the sad tale of the vendors that exist to knit the post-trade derivatives market together – messaging, middleware and reconciliation services.
Once, not that long ago, these firms were all trailblazing, rule-breaking, high-fiving problem-solvers. Now, they are part of the furniture. When trying to cut costs in recent years, banks have trained their sights on these services, among others – conversations and relationships have become strained, with banks said to be complaining about what they see as “excessive tolls”. An executive at one new-tech upstart describes the firms collectively as “rent-seeking parasites”.
When that description is put to two former post-trade vendors, their first reaction is to laugh. Both of them remember the good old days, when firms like these were at the cutting edge.
The first says: “I get how that goes. People are asked to solve problems at a certain point of a market’s development and then become the rent-seeking parasite over time – eventually customers resent paying money for it, because the problem has already been solved.”
It’s a poignant reflection not just because he worked at one of these firms, but also because he’s currently trying to build a new one.
“I’m trying to ensure that doesn’t become us – how do you ensure you don’t become a parasite?” he asks.
The second ex-post-trade vendor has some general advice. He thinks the parasites term ignores all the good, synergistic growth that post-trade services have been able to unlock, but adds: “I do think it’s fair to ask ‘What have you done for me lately?’ of any tech provider; and if that provider is not innovating, is not continually trying to drive costs down, then the criticism may be warranted.”
If today’s innovators find themselves in this situation, it will mean they have succeeded: they moved fast, they found something to fix, and people liked their solution.
But lasting success requires stronger foundations, which could be a challenge for some of today’s narrower start-ups – fixing one thing and then collecting a toll won’t be enough to keep your clients happy for long.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Why did UK keep the pension fund clearing exemption?
Liquidity concerns, desire for higher returns and clearing capacity all possible reasons for going its own way
UBS’s Iabichino holds a mirror to bank funding risks
Framing funding management as an optimal control problem affords an alternative to proxy hedging
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Lots to fear, including fear itself
Binary scenarios for key investment risks in this year’s Top 10 are worrying buy-siders
Podcast: Alexei Kondratyev on quantum computing
Imperial College London professor updates expectations for future tech
Quants mine gold for new market-making model
Novel approach to modelling cointegrated assets could be applied to FX and potentially even corporate bond pricing
Thin-skinned: are CCPs skimping on capital cover?
Growth of default funds calls into question clearers’ skin in the game
Quants dive into FX fixing windows debate
Longer fixing windows may benefit clients, but predicting how dealers will respond is tough