From prophets to ‘parasites’
How post-trade vendors went from problem-solvers to ‘rent-seekers’
Today’s financial markets are stuffed to the gills with would-be innovators and disruptors – many of them former bankers with a new passion for moving fast, breaking things and shaving every other day.
There’s a lesson for them all in the sad tale of the vendors that exist to knit the post-trade derivatives market together – messaging, middleware and reconciliation services.
Once, not that long ago, these firms were all trailblazing, rule-breaking, high-fiving problem-solvers. Now, they are part of the furniture. When trying to cut costs in recent years, banks have trained their sights on these services, among others – conversations and relationships have become strained, with banks said to be complaining about what they see as “excessive tolls”. An executive at one new-tech upstart describes the firms collectively as “rent-seeking parasites”.
When that description is put to two former post-trade vendors, their first reaction is to laugh. Both of them remember the good old days, when firms like these were at the cutting edge.
The first says: “I get how that goes. People are asked to solve problems at a certain point of a market’s development and then become the rent-seeking parasite over time – eventually customers resent paying money for it, because the problem has already been solved.”
It’s a poignant reflection not just because he worked at one of these firms, but also because he’s currently trying to build a new one.
“I’m trying to ensure that doesn’t become us – how do you ensure you don’t become a parasite?” he asks.
The second ex-post-trade vendor has some general advice. He thinks the parasites term ignores all the good, synergistic growth that post-trade services have been able to unlock, but adds: “I do think it’s fair to ask ‘What have you done for me lately?’ of any tech provider; and if that provider is not innovating, is not continually trying to drive costs down, then the criticism may be warranted.”
If today’s innovators find themselves in this situation, it will mean they have succeeded: they moved fast, they found something to fix, and people liked their solution.
But lasting success requires stronger foundations, which could be a challenge for some of today’s narrower start-ups – fixing one thing and then collecting a toll won’t be enough to keep your clients happy for long.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Why a Trumpian world could be good for trend
Trump’s U-turns have hit returns, but the forces that put him in office could revive the investment strategy
Roll over, SRTs: Regulators fret over capital relief trades
Banks will have to balance the appeal of capital relief against the risk of a market shutdown
Thrown under the Omnibus: will GAR survive EU’s green rollback?
Green finance metric in limbo after suspension sees 90% of top EU banks forgo reporting
Has the Collins Amendment reached its endgame?
Scott Bessent wants to end the dual capital stack. How that would work in practice remains unclear
Talking Heads 2025: Who will buy Trump’s big, beautiful bonds?
Treasury issuance and hedge fund risks vex macro heavyweights
The AI explainability barrier is lowering
Improved and accessible tools can quickly make sense of complex models
Do BIS volumes soar past the trend?
FX market ADV has surged to $9.6 trillion in the latest triennial survey, but are these figures representative?
DFAST monoculture is its own test
Drop in frequency and scope of stress test disclosures makes it hard to monitor bank mimicry of Fed models