
How energy players are reaching the limits of hedging
Commodities firms face lasting changes in 2018
The energy hedging market is in constant flux: end-users and producers enter and leave depending on their financial limits, estimates of future market conditions and management beliefs and strategies; banks and speculative financial players swarm or recoil as price curves change shape. However, in 2018, a couple of developments in the energy business promise to produce more lasting changes.
Smart meters are finally becoming commonplace in major electricity markets. A majority of households in the US already have them, while the UK has targeted 2020 for virtually complete household coverage. Other major economies around the world have similar plans. And while it has taken US utilities a while to work out exactly what to do with the torrent of user data these meters provide, time-of-use rates are now poised to roll out in some of the largest markets in the US. The result could be less volatility, lower margins and a significant drop in the demand for power hedging.
Time-of-use rates are now poised to roll out in some of the largest markets in the US. The result could be less volatility, lower margins and a significant drop in the demand for power hedging
Much of this rests on assumptions about the degree to which consumers will alter their behaviour in response to the introduction of TOU rates – something that remains unclear, especially for the retail market. Introducing smart appliances could help here, but that assumes smart meters will operate on a single open standard that appliances could effortlessly and seamlessly use as an interface – which looks like an optimistic belief, to say the least. Hopes of behavioural change might be better founded in the commercial and industrial sectors.
Hedging is also dwindling at the long end of the oil market – in part because of backwardation, but also because of fundamental changes in the hedging market. Bank withdrawals from the commodity hedging market have left little liquidity at the far end of the curve, and an influx of speculative money at the near end is making market movements difficult to forecast. Many of the changes may reverse when the price curve changes, but the banks will not return any time soon – their regulators have made their feelings clear on the issue. This, more than any other factor, means the oil hedging business has changed significantly and permanently.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Getting a handle on model parameters
Mean reversion in rate parameters opens the door to dimensionality reduction
The case for believing in a Bessent put
Money market funds could prove critical in efforts to control 10-year yields
FRTB may bite harder for Europe’s CVA modellers
Farther reach of advanced approach and lighter load on total requirements mean limited takeaways from Canada and Japan’s implementation
Japan, Basel III and the pitfalls of being on time
Capital floor phase-in delay may be least-worst option for JFSA as US and Europe waver
FX traders revel in March Madness
Chaotic Trump policies finally bring diversity to flows – to the delight of market-makers
Market knee-jerks keep VAR models on their toes
With a return to volatility, increased backtesting exceptions show banks’ algos are stretched
A market-making model for an options portfolio
Vladimir Lucic and Alex Tse fill a glaring gap in European-style derivatives modelling
How AI agents could become investing’s crash test dummies
Firms mull the use of chatbot simulations to test organisational set-ups