Skip to main content

Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures

Risk.net

Composable clearing: how blockchain reconciles efficiency and safety in intermediated markets

Nicolas Zhang

  • Pooled and purely bilateral market designs cannot be both efficient and safe.
  • A composable two-layer design reaches the safety-efficiency-prefunding frontier.
  • Singleness of money is one way to settle atomically; tokenization enables others.
  • Blockchain lowers the cost of atomic multilateral clearing, not its economics.

Clearing sits between trading and settlement and must reconcile two goals that existing designs trade off against one another: efficiency, which requires letting participants trade on privately known preferences, and safety, which requires prefunded collateral and final settlement. We show that neither pooled mechanisms, such as automated market makers, nor purely bilateral ones, such as uncleared over-the-counter markets, can achieve both, whereas a composable two-layer framework – an aggregative trading and price-allocation layer, composed with a prefunded clearing layer through an atomic settlement map – can. Blockchain does not change the economics of clearing; it lowers the cost of implementing this atomic, multilateral composition, expanding the attainable safety–efficiency–prefunding frontier. The framework reinterprets the singleness of money: settling in central bank money is one implementation of the atomic settlement map, but tokenization allows the same finality to be obtained over high-quality collateral such as tokenized Treasury bills, without central bank money necessarily being the settlement asset. Applications to Treasury repo and to thinly traded foreign-exchange pairs show how tokenization is reshaping the structure of financial markets.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here