Uncertain rates outlook poses challenge for corporate FX hedgers
Hedging programmes may need a revamp as EM/G10 rates differentials narrow
If 2023 was the year of predictable global interest rate rises, 2024 could prove to be a bit more uncertain.
Many observers believe US rates have finally peaked, and a lot of banks are pricing that the Federal Reserve will make its first cut in March with five quarter-point cuts to follow. Others predict the European Central Bank will follow suit in the second quarter, as will the Bank of England.
What foreign exchange hedgers – and those at corporates, in particular – will be keeping an eye on are the various interest rate differentials between the US and other countries.
Last year, the wide gap in these differentials between G10 and emerging market (EM) countries led to a flock of investors utilising the carry trade strategy to profit from currencies with much higher interest rates, including the Brazilian real, Colombian peso and Mexican peso.
For US and European corporates, the differentials were reflected in increased costs when using FX forwards to hedge future cash flows from emerging markets.
As the year progressed, these differentials began to shrink as some countries started cutting their benchmark rates. Brazil made its first cut of 50 basis points in August, taking rates to 13.25%, and has since made a cut of 50bp every month. Colombia, meanwhile, cut its benchmark rate by 2.5bp to 13%. This has led to a fall in Brazilian real and Colombian peso non-deliverable forward points.
The outlier appears to be Mexico. The country’s central bank has maintained its hawkish stance by holding interest rates at 11.25% for a sixth straight meeting, meaning the carry could still make the peso more expensive for hedging.
Some banks – like Deutsche Bank in a recent note – suggest the next 12 months will see a narrowing of EM/G10 interest rate differentials and cheaper opportunities to hedge as a result. The Deutsche note states that vol levels will determine how EM currencies will perform as the carry buffer is removed.
In preparation for this uncertainty, corporate treasurers are adopting more sophisticated technologies for managing currency risks, including carry, and using this data to adjust their FX hedging programmes.
If the carry differential between G10 and EM currencies compresses, large multinationals with sophisticated programmes could increase their hedge ratios for EM currencies to the upper bound of their policies and lengthen their hedges.
At the same time, bank sales teams have been touting more advanced hedging structures that can allow corporates to minimise costs.
Some, for example, have looked to create a basket of hedges – a portfolio – where instead of paying carry on individual EM currency pairs, they have aggregated several correlated pairs together in order to benefit from net carry effects. In other words, instead of worrying whether one currency pair is too expensive to hedge, the performance is determined by the aggregate hedging cost of the portfolio of currencies.
As corporates become more comfortable with using options for hedging purposes, dealers are also offering structured forwards that include embedded options, which might, for instance, allow corporates to participate to a certain extent in the upside.
More banks are also offering so-called floating spot forwards. This product allows a corporate to lock in the forward points but allow the spot component to float over a given period. When the spot has risen sufficiently during that time it could be locked in, at which point the product converts to a regular FX forward comprising the new spot rate plus the previously fixed forward points.
It is a structure that was initially used by UK power provider Drax, but until recently only a handful of banks were able to offer it.
With corporates looking to be more proactive as markets potentially enter a cycle of global interest rate cuts, capitalising on these flows will become even more crucial for banks. Banks with large corporate franchises performed much better in the first half of 2023 than those with mainly institutional flows, and this pattern looks set to be repeated in the second half.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
BofA quants propose new model for when to hold, when to sell
Closed-form formula helps market-makers optimise exit strategies
Are regulators wrong to think of AT1s as debt?
Bank capital bonds face criticism. One answer might be to treat them as ‘fixed-income equity’
How Risk.net’s robots unlocked Ucits trade data
Machine learning tool helps reveal the largest European derivatives users – and who they trade with
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Another post-Libor rate aims to clear Iosco bar
After two rivals were slapped down by the benchmark overseer last year, will Axi fare differently?
Nvidia is growing up. It’s not settling down
Chip maker is a mega cap that doesn’t act like one
FX forwards dealers face added challenges in P&L analysis
Mark-out tools for forwards and swaps trading may not be a panacea
Can history resolve factor investors’ p-hacking questions?
Quants seek reassurance in the far distant past