Journal of Risk Model Validation

Risk.net

Validation nightmare: the slotting approach under International Financial Reporting Standard 9

Lukasz Prorokowski, Oleg Deev and Jena-Daniel Guigou

  • Correspondence between the slotting scores and PDs is possible to satisfy the IFRS 9 rules on denotching and staging.
  • For the PD mapping methodology, both the target RWA and Expected Loss should be considered.
  • Since there are distinct slotting categories, the sequential process should be solved for each slotting category.
  • For the PD mapping methodology, the exposures should be differentiated by the maturity regulatory-prescribed thresholds.

This paper makes an important contribution to the practice of validation by focusing on an under-researched area of the slotting approach to real estate specialized lending under the International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9) framework. The paper introduces the concept of mapping the probability of default estimates to the slotting scores. A sequential process for deriving the correspondence between the slotting scores and probabilities of default of a particular obligor is proposed as a solution to adapting the slotting approach to the IFRS 9 rules. This solution is especially useful for capturing the increase in credit risk under the IFRS 9 rules using denotching and staging processes. All in all, this paper addresses the research questions of whether and how a slotting model can be used for IFRS 9 compliance purposes. In addition to the core aim of the paper, which is the provision of a probability of default mapping solution under the IFRS 9 framework, we also explain the methodology of a slotting model, discussing specific modeling choices for the real estate slotting approach aligned to the relevant regulatory framework. In doing so, we provide an example of a slotting model that can be used by practitioners as a challenger model during the validation exercise.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here