Put options power up variable annuities
Insurance quants increase risk-adjusted profits using novel hedging technique
Variable annuities are a popular long-term investment vehicle and a common component of retirement schemes. In the US alone, about $100 billion of variable annuities are sold every year, making up about half the total annuities market.
But there is no standard way for insurance companies to hedge the risk of variable annuity contracts.
Two industry practitioners have put forward a new hedging method using protective put options. They estimate that the technique can improve risk-adjusted profits for insurers’ variable annuity portfolios by 60%.
The improvement comes from two sources: more efficient use of options as a hedging tool, and a reduction in the capital charges for insurers.
The approach is based on the assumption that a variable annuity can technically be seen as an option on the future value of the premiums. “The liabilities can be modelled as long-dated options and we use short-dated put options to hedge them. And we are framing how to calculate that hedge and optimise capital requirements,” explains Vivek Shah, who oversees investment and hedging solutions at Prudential plc in London. Shah co-authored the research with Benoit Vaucher, director of research at Edhec Business School.
Hedging variable annuities is important because of the nature of the product. The contracts often come with various types of guarantee, making the management of the liabilities more complex for providers. Since variable annuities are affected by market risk, volatility and other factors, the provider must use hedging to ensure the policy delivers the guaranteed income at maturity.
Moreover, insurers need to hold regulatory capital to protect their portfolios in case of sudden drawdowns or a stressed environment. As regulators in Asia, Europe and the US are moving towards the use of risk-based capital metrics, hedging can help reduce the charges by reducing the exposure of the insurers’ portfolios.
Despite the key role of hedging in the performance of these products, the topic is not widely explored in financial theory and literature. The effect of hedging on capital charges is often neglected in the industry, too. “It’s feasible that even among the big institutions this issue hasn’t been properly addressed,” says Shah.
Hedging variable annuities with put options is not simple. The insurer’s liabilities typically have maturities of 20–30 years, while the put options have much shorter maturities, 10 years at best, and are possibly illiquid. The two cannot directly match.
There needs to be greater dialogue between investment banks and insurance firms on how derivative hedging solutions can address insurance firms’ long-dated liabilities and regulatory capital requirements
Vivek Shah, Prudential
Shah and Vaucher’s proposed strategy relies on optimising the P&L of the variable annuity portfolio and its hedges to take into account risk-based capital charges, in addition to market factors and specific elements such as management fees. They do so by rolling positions on put options and rebalancing with a set frequency. To determine the quantity of put options needed, the authors use a backward-recursive method that computes the value of the optimal hedging portfolio for each possible value of the underlying.
Their study shows that the strategy significantly improves risk-adjusted profits for the insurer, in simulations run with a realistic parameterisation and fat-tailed distributions.
The technique doesn’t just exist on paper; it’s also in real-world use, Shah reveals. “In production at Prudential’s US subsidiary, Jackson National Life, a more sophisticated version of this approach is implemented and constantly updated and improved,” he says.
The motivation behind the initial project comes from what Shah perceives as a lack of fully satisfactory support from banks on hedging issues that are specific to the insurance sector.
Banks offer derivative products to insurers looking to hedge their long-term liabilities, but don’t go far in advising on the optimal strategies for their clients, Shah says. Banks also don’t take into account the interconnectedness between hedging strategy and capital charges. Shah, who has a banking background and knows well the other side of the fence, decided to proactively suggest a possible solution. “Essentially what we’re trying to do here is to find the optimal hedging strategy that can be offered to insurance firms to help them manage their longer-dated liabilities” he says.
“There needs to be greater dialogue between investment banks’ structuring and trading teams and insurance firms on how derivative hedging solutions can address insurance firms’ long-dated liabilities and regulatory capital requirements; both in the interest rate and equity dimensions,” he adds.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Podcast: Lorenzo Ravagli on why the skew is for the many
JP Morgan quant proposes a unified framework for trading the volatility skew premium
Quants see promise in DeBerta’s untangled reading
Improved language models are able to grasp context better
Counterparty risk model links defaults to portfolio values
Fed’s Michael Pykhtin proposes using copula models to capture effects of margin calls on default risk
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
Is JSCC-CFTC stalemate about to be broken?
Japan CCP gains allies in battle to clear yen swaps for US clients, but CFTC shakeup could dash hopes
What T+1 risk? Dealers shake off FX concerns
Predictions of increased settlement risk and later-in-the-day trading have yet to materialise
Go your own way: departures pose new challenges for CFTC
Loss of Democratic majority would impede chairman’s ambitions for regulatory agenda
Altice’s dropdown is a warning for European creditors
Carve-out used to shield assets from lenders may occur in a fifth of European deals