![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Global investors seek clarity on China ‘short swing’ rule
Fund managers seek clear exemption from single-stock exposure that could curb China growth plans
![China figures swing China figures swing](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/2020-05/China-figures-swing.jpg.webp?h=7dae47a1&itok=1BDZhY6S)
The world’s largest asset managers are seeking to clarify their exemption from a rule that limits permitted exposure to a single Chinese company – and trips up momentum among global investors to increase their exposure to China’s equity markets.
At issue is China’s short-swing profit rule, which prevents any asset manager with more than 5% of a mainland China company from selling its stock in that company less than six months after acquisition. The rule is designed to prevent stakeholders
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Could the SEC revive the private fund adviser rule?
Industry experts deem a second life for the reviled rule unlikely
NAIC softens its rating overhaul. Insurers still don’t like it
Insurers worry that the regulatory body could override credit ratings without sufficient explanation
EU reporting regime a ‘hurdle’ for risk transfer deals, say investors
Onerous disclosure templates could deter US banks from marketing synthetic securitisations to European buyers
Fears of runaway risk on offshore reinsurance
Life insurers catch the eye of UK regulator for pension buyout financing trick
Hot topic: SEC climate disclosure rule divides industry
Proposal likely to flounder on First Amendment concerns, lawyers believe
Equitable lobbies for concentration charge on riskier ABS
“Ultra-high correlation of losses” between lower-rated tranches requires new regulation, insurer says
Court showdown looms for SEC private adviser rules
Legal victory for the regulator would establish new powers of prohibition, critics claim
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks