Banks rail against China CCPs’ loss-sharing policy

Controversial loss allocation technique remains unused during the Covid meltdown, but banks want it banned

Shanghai sunrise
The Shanghai Futures Exchange is one of at least six venues to have ‘forced reduction’ rules

Global banks are pressuring China’s clearing houses to abandon a recovery tool that could compel members to absorb the loss-making positions of other firms during times of market stress.

“The challenge … is that market participants are facing a risk they can’t measure, manage or hedge in advance due to optionality,” says Nicolas Friedman, global co-head of counterparty credit risk at Goldman Sachs.

The loss allocation technique, known as forced position reduction, works by effectively setting

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here