Ripping up the old asset class labels
Outmoded classifications of securities may be concealing market risk. AI has a better idea
Asset managers, it seems, are no longer convinced the asset class labels that markets have used for decades make much sense. Research by Lazard Asset Management casts doubt on whether high-yield bonds, for instance, reliably move in tandem under similar circumstances.
So Lazard and others have been trying out AI algorithms to balance portfolios using machine-identified clusters instead. The idea is to look at the way securities behave, rather than their sector, geography, issuer or credit rating.
Allowing a computer to learn from scratch how instruments should be grouped, though, means that as many as a third are reclassified. That’s likely to alarm buy-siders, who rely on expertly mixing asset classes to maximise diversification.
Jai Jacob, who leads Lazard’s multi-asset investment team, says portfolio allocators make an “important assumption” when using conventional asset classes and their correlations to guide the rebalancing of holdings. Instead, quants could take a lead from other areas of data science and look at the data to define asset groups, he thinks.
“We’ve ended up having to live with a set of basic assumptions about asset categories for decades,” Jacob says. “It’s in every investment policy statement. It’s in lists of multiple choice questions. It’s all over the place.” The categories were only ever intended as simple ways to cover for a lack of data, though.
The use of clustering algorithms to splinter these historic asset blocks and form new groups of instruments that do behave alike would help asset managers reduce churn in portfolios when holdings fail to offset each other as expected. The new groups might also protect against big correlation shifts, such as a switchback in correlation between equities and bonds.
Moving away from static asset class definitions could also help in constructing more efficient portfolios.
Historically an investor who thought the US dollar would strengthen might invest in US small caps, which are less exposed to a rising US dollar, Jacob explains.
“That’s a logical view, and it’s commonly held. But it chains two assumptions together: first, that the US dollar is strengthening, and second, that US small cap is the right way to play it.”
Instead, by using data science investors could “on the fly” isolate a new asset class representing specific stocks that benefit from the US dollar strengthening. “That is much more powerful,” he says.
In June 2018, Bank of America launched a risk-parity strategy that employs much the same concept: balancing between asset groups as defined by a machine learning algorithm rather than between largely bonds and equities as traditional risk parity does.
For BofA, it’s a way to address the yield drag that comes with holding bonds by investing instead in other instruments that perform the same role – such as defensive stocks, perhaps.
Will the idea catch on? That’s unclear.
Pension funds, consultancies and index builders still organise their research around conventional asset class buckets and seem unlikely to change. Investment policy statements use these familiar terms.
But for firms like Lazard, the time may be coming when labels like high yield are erased completely from the playbook.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
BofA quants propose new model for when to hold, when to sell
Closed-form formula helps market-makers optimise exit strategies
Are regulators wrong to think of AT1s as debt?
Bank capital bonds face criticism. One answer might be to treat them as ‘fixed-income equity’
How Risk.net’s robots unlocked Ucits trade data
Machine learning tool helps reveal the largest European derivatives users – and who they trade with
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Another post-Libor rate aims to clear Iosco bar
After two rivals were slapped down by the benchmark overseer last year, will Axi fare differently?
Nvidia is growing up. It’s not settling down
Chip maker is a mega cap that doesn’t act like one
FX forwards dealers face added challenges in P&L analysis
Mark-out tools for forwards and swaps trading may not be a panacea
Can history resolve factor investors’ p-hacking questions?
Quants seek reassurance in the far distant past