Asia-Pacific banks grapple with conduct risk rules

Australia, Hong Kong regimes lead in developing conduct risk guidelines; Singapore lags behind

Conduct risk

Bankers in Asia have looked from afar as US and European institutions suffered punitive fines for conduct failings and, consequently, big increases in their operational risk capital. Any sense of complacency in Hong Kong, Singapore or Sydney is fast diminishing, though, as local regulators issue greater penalties for malpractice and enforce new codes of conduct.

Influenced by the UK’s Senior Managers Regime, Australia is due to impose an accountability code known as BEAR, which clarifies the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here