CCP fire drills lack real-world punch, banks say

Dealers claim the current CCP fire drill process is flawed because it doesn't take into account that banks can be members of multiple CCPs

fire-drill-shutterstock-161498726

Fire drills conducted by central counterparties (CCPs) do not reflect the conditions of a real default scenario, dealers claim, since they are run by clearing houses on an individual basis when banks are often members of multiple CCPs.

While LCH.Clearnet was the only major CCP clearing swaps in 2008 when Lehman Brothers defaulted, market participants can now clear over-the-counter derivatives at CME Group, Eurex, Ice or a number of regional clearing services, such as those in Brazil, Hong Kong

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here