Insurers underestimating Pillar III reporting demands

Vendors emphasise importance of future-proofing IT systems to prevent delays in producing Solvency II reports

regulation

Smaller insurance firms are underestimating the strain on their reporting processes arising from Solvency II Pillar III requirements, say industry experts. In particular, insurers should replace legacy systems that are ill-equipped to cope with the frequent changes to reporting requirements expected following the implementation of the Directive in 2016, they say.

Mutual insurers in the UK are among those less likely to have grasped the magnitude of change expected when Solvency II goes live

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here