Integrating risk management with the investment process - a Munich Re case study
The perennial challenge for insurers and reinsurers is to make certain that the assets they hold will cover all their present and future liabilities. Traditionally, companies have sought to manage the risk of a shortfall through careful design and pricing of products, while investing accumulated premiums with the aim of maximising their value. However, this approach can lead to a disconnection between the liabilities and the assets meant to cover them, which can become more pronounced and problematic during periods of market stress. Christian Dahmen, Markus Hummel and Curt Burmeister discuss how risk was integrated into the investment process at Munich Re
Strengthening the connection between risk management and the investment process is a key step insurers need to take to be able to close the gap between assets and liabilities. The vast majority of Munich Re's assets (€210 billion market value as of September 30, 2013) are managed by the Munich Ergo Asset Management (MEAG) arm of the business.
Integrating risk management with the investment process in such a broad-based insurance enterprise, which comprises 70 legal entities of varying sizes
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
More cleared repo sponsors join Eurex ahead of cross-margining
End of TLTROs for banks and pension fund search for liquidity management tools drives uptake
Reimagining model risk management: new tools and approaches for a new era
A collaborative report by Chartis and Evalueserve on how the use of automation can combat the growing complexity of managing model risk due to regulation and market volatility
What Goldman’s appeal victory means for Fed stress tests
Decision could embolden more banks to appeal, analysts say. But others believe result is one-off
Clearing members rattled as CME approved to launch its own FCM
National Futures Association registration sharpens concerns about conflict of interest with CCP
CME files application for US Treasury and repo clearing
New entrant believes direct user access model will avoid accounting problem that hampers rival FICC
UST repo clearing: considerations for ‘done-away’ implementation
Citi’s Mariam Rafi sets out the drivers for sponsored and agent clearing of Treasury repo and reverse repo
Gensler to stick to Treasury clearing timetable
SEC chief promises to keep up the pressure for done-away trades
Clearing houses fear being classified as Dora third parties
As 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members seek risk information that’s usually deemed confidential