Clarity call for trade repository reporting

To allow regulators to aggregate data on derivatives trades sent to trade repositories, reporting needs to achieve global standardisation but progress towards this goal is proving a long road. Five industry participants give their views.

globe-academic

Stewart Macbeth, chief executive, DTCC Deriv/Serv
We understand the format of the data we will receive as a trade repository, but additional clarity is needed regarding exactly how the content will be specified and how market participants send it. With respect to counterparty codes, our understanding is that the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma) is looking at three options: a legal entity identifier (LEI); an interim identifier; or a business identifier code (BIC). Esma is looking

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here