![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Double standards: India aims to reconcile Basel liquidity ratios with domestic rules
The recent financial crisis was one of liquidity rather than solvency but as the Basel Committee looks at the best way to legislate for this risk, India is facing a different issue: how to integrate its already tough liquidity framework with the new international standards. Deepak Singhal, chief general manager at the Reserve Bank of India, speaks to Asia Risk
![reserve-bank-of-india reserve-bank-of-india](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/013/230013/reserve-bank-of-india-2-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=4Fv1GGBT)
One of the key problems for Asian states in implementing the Basel III accord is the issue of liquidity. And while Hong Kong has had to resort to allowing local banks to take on foreign currency assets and Australia has had to create a liquidity facility for its banks, India’s historic focus on liquidity management means it already has a complex set of rules on this issue which it is trying to integrate with the approach taken by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Indian bank regulation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US