A focus on gone-concern contingent capital

Regulators have found it easier to reach consensus on a standard for contingent capital that converts at the point of a bank’s insolvency, but continue to struggle with the definitions for going-concern conversion. How will supervisors proceed? Joel Clark reports

simon-hills-bba-0809

This year is turning out to be an odd one for regulatory capital. As the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision enters the final stage of calibrating the Basel II reform package, dubbed Basel III, it seems likely banks will need to raise hefty amounts of extra capital to meet the new requirements. But nothing is yet guaranteed, and the possibility of significant recalibration, coupled with the uncertainty over what instrument types will qualify under the new framework, means capital issuance has

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here