Beyond distributional analysis

In the third article in a four-part series, David Rowe considers the need for financial risk management to move beyond distributional analysis to consider more qualitative inputs

risk-davidrowe-gif

Since the mid-1980s, financial risk management has developed many complex methods for summarising and aggregating risk. These widely applied techniques are useful for managing day-to-day fluctuations, but in too many organisations they have blinded management to the need to analyse an array of structural issues that come to the fore in a severe systemic crisis. The following are two of the areas demanding increased attention in the future.


Self-referential risk

Human reactions to inertia can be

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here