Counting the cost of counterparty risk

A few years ago no-one worried about counterparty credit risk. Then a year ago that was all anyone cared about. As markets begin to settle down, the shake-up could have longer-term implications for the structured products market. By John Ferry

abacus-shadow

Go back seven or eight years and there were essentially two aspects of a structured product that investors were interested in: the safety element – whether they wanted full or partial principal protection or some other variant – and the option component, which gave them exposure to a risky asset. Then came the development of an expanded set of wrapper possibilities, which meant there were three aspects of the product the potential buyer – be it a third-party distributor or an institutional

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here