US legislators outline derivatives proposals
Two committee chairmen from the US House of Representatives have published a concept paper on regulation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives designed to guide any future legislation.
Congressmen Collin Peterson, chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, and Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, released the paper yesterday. They said it would guide the two committees in the development of legislation to regulate derivatives when Congress returns from the summer recess in September.
The paper said the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should oversee regulation of OTC derivative dealers, exchanges and clearinghouses, depending on the underlying asset on which a derivative is based.
It also called for mandatory clearing of all OTC derivatives through an approved clearinghouse. Trading on exchanges and electronic platforms should be "strongly incentivised and encouraged" through higher margins and capital requirements for non-exchange-traded transactions or those that are not cleared centrally.
Non-standardised products (as determined by the appropriate regulator) and transactions where one party does not qualify as a major market participant (as determined by the appropriate regulator and the Financial Oversight Council) would be exempt from mandatory clearing under the proposals.
US regulators should also work with foreign regulators to harmonize OTC regulations, according to Peterson and Frank.
Chairman Peterson said: "I think we have come up with a responsible approach that bridges the differences between those members who want to completely eliminate the over-the-counter market and those who think that just greater transparency is all that is needed. Neither of those approaches is a real solution; what we are putting forth is."
Chairman Frank said: "Nobody here wants to ban [derivatives] or even severely diminish them as an economic instrument. The Committee on Agriculture represents a lot of end users for whom they are very important. The Committee on Financial Services deals with a lot of the financial institutions. They have an interest that has to be blended."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness