![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
FBI Arrests Russian over Goldman Sachs trade secret theft
NEW YORK - The FBI has arrested a Russian computer programmer for allegedly stealing proprietary trading code from Goldman Sachs. The Feds believe that 39-year-old Russian emigre Sergey Aleynikov copied the valuable code, which Goldman uses to compute its automated trading positions, from his work desktop to a server in Germany. Aleynikov was arrested on July 3 as he stepped off a flight at Liberty international airport in Newark and was subsequently charged with "theft of trade secrets" with bail set at $750,000.
"Secret sauce is the phrase that a lot of people use," says Dan Hubscher, principal product marketing manager for capital markets at high-frequency trading and surveillance application platform Progress Apama. "It is valuable proprietary information. The large banks big in high-frequency trading are not using a common algorithm, it is highly customised and how they gain competitive advantage. Given the reaction, this must be a code core to their trading strategies."
Goldman says that if its competitors get hold of the 'black box' codes its ability to profit from the speed and efficiency of its system would be largely nullified. Goldman has spent millions developing the jealously guarded code and related programs, which offer competitive advantage through instantaneous, automated trading decisions. Aleynikov worked at Goldman between May 2007 and June 2009, earning $400,000 a year as a programmer to develop and improve the trading platform, before moving to start-up firm Teza Technologies in Chicago for a tripled salary and engaged in high-volume automated trading.
Aleynikov has released a statement professing his innocence, claiming he meant only to copy open source files, and only accidentally transferred the proprietary code, which he claims he did not pass on to any third party. Goldman was tipped off about the intellectual property spill when monitoring data uploads from its system via https. The bank recovered his desktop's command history from the Unix-based operating system he used to edit and maintain code on the trading platform and found Aleynikov had transferred a total of 32 megabytes of the code on least three occasions from his desktop to the file-sharing site svn.xp-dev.com, which is London-registered and uses a server in Bavaria, Germany.
"You have to look at who is accessing the code, where does it reside and what controls are in place," says Andre Edelbrock, chief executive at collaborative anti-fraud vendor Ethoca. "That type of code should not be allowed to leave the building. I had assumed that Goldman had some elaborate controls and monitoring of those systems."
Chicago-based hedge fund Citadel Investment Group is also suing a former executive and two other employees for violating their non-compete contractual clauses by setting up Teza Technologies - the firm Aleynikov joined on July 2. "This is a case of industrial espionage," says the Citadel complaint, filed in an Illinois state court. Princeton-educated Russian astrophysicist Mikhail Malyshev's quantitative trading unit made 40% returns for Citadel last year, despite Citadel's flagship portfolios losing 50% in the same period. The legal challenge named Malyshev, Jace Kohlmeier and Matthew Hinerfeld, claiming their nine-month non-compete clause runs until November, until when they are paid $30,000 a month by Citadel. Teza called the civil complaint "frivolous" and an attempt to harass its executives.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
The boy who cried ‘outlier’: false alarms could dog EBA test
Analysis reveals banks deemed outliers by net income test are profitable post-shock, so how useful is the test?
Modernising compliance functions with regtech
Regtech addresses the complexities of regulatory requirements, offering innovative tools to modernise compliance functions, streamline processes and enhance efficiency. This article explores its role in compliance and reporting within the banking sector,…
For the Fed discount window, destigmatisation starts at home
US supervisors must change tack to encourage central bank liquidity utilisation
Study finds just 10 banks plan to apply for FRTB models
Research provides extra insight on reasons for decline in internal models
EU banks hedge net interest income to pass new IRRBB test
Would-be outliers look to cut sensitivity of cashflows to rate moves, but at what cost?
Banks cry foul over shock decision from Basel Committee
Asset and liability management professionals question severity of criteria in revised IRRBB tests
Fresh EU push for single securities supervisor to compete with US
But MEP expresses ‘concern’ EU nations will stall revival of capital markets union
Discord deepens over fund-linked trades in FRTB
More banks use punitive approach to capital treatment under new trading book regime, irking regulators