Editor’s letter
Paul Lyon paul.lyon@incisivemedia.com +44 (0)20 7484 9802
One leading distributor of structured products for the Italian retail market last month complained to me that increased scrutiny of new products by the Bank of Italy has slowed down the approval process considerably. “Product approval now takes up to twice as long in a post-Parmalat world. And we sometimes only get that approval the day before we are set to launch,” he said. “Of course, we observe the letter of the law, but lengthy waits can prove to be tedious.”
That same distributor also pointed out that regulatory requirements to provide investors with mountains of information may not be the best way to promote transparency. Instead, product specification details should be condensed to provide a more easily digestible overview, he said.
But some new regulation could prove to be more than welcome. As we report in our cover story, the European Union’s ‘Prospectus Directive’ rules, which come into force next year, could be a boon for the banks that structure investment products. The EU plans to create a single pan-European level playing field for financial products, effectively liberalising the selling of structured products in retail markets across the region.
It will be interesting to see if the rules really lead to true liberalisation. So far, opinions are divided. Dealers that structure products say most northern European countries, such as Luxembourg, Austria and the Netherlands, already uphold the principal of mutual recognition of products. It is those in the south, in countries like Italy and Spain, where they say state-level rules currently get in the way of a single market for structured products.
And as Javier Ruiz del Pozo, Madrid-based deputy director of primary markets at Spain’s securities market regulator the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, warns – “major problems could arise”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses