US regulators tackle unintended consequences of BSA enforcement

At a recent anti-money laundering (AML) conference in New York, US financial regulators conceded the enforcement of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) has produced negative, unintended consequences in the financial industry.

The industry has increasingly complained of the mounting burden of Bank Secrecy Act compliance, as well as the uncertainty of future requirements, especially in the filing of suspicious activity reports (SARs).

Seeing that regulators and law enforcement authorities have set a zero-tolerance level for SAR-filing deficiencies, banking organisations are concerned that in certain situations failing to file a SAR could result in a criminal prosecution. Some banks even believe they have to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here