US senator voices concerns over Basel II in senate committee hearing
Senator Tim Johnson (Democrat, South Dakota) slammed aspects of Basel II in a US Senate committee on banking, housing and urban affairs yesterday for its regulatory burden on banks and claimed that the revised accord would stymie US competitiveness.
“Basel II was intended to create a risk-based capital regime. However, because of what I presume are political compromises, the latest draft would impose a heavy regulatory burden on large banks, while ironically, reducing their competitiveness in the global marketplace… While safety and soundness of our insured depositories is, of course, paramount, the last thing we should be doing is making it harder for American banks to compete, both home and abroad,” he said.
Johnson also slated aspects of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) on Basel II that he says contain loopholes to exempt industrial loan companies (ILCs). ILCs are financial institutions that may be owned by non-financial institutions, and have been a source of controversy in the US due to different and lower standards of regulation. The loophole was allowed to exist to assist very small companies, but has warranted further investigation as firms such as Wal-Mart have made moves to exploit its benefits.
“In my view, any insured depository institution which has a significant volume and value of transactions that could directly or indirectly affect the payments system, should be required to capitalise that risk. Operational risk is not a function of the nature of the parent company; it is a function of the scale and complexity of the activity taking place inside of the insured depository institutions,” said Johnson.
Johnson’s criticisms were expressed while the NPR for Basel II is being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, and could still be changed prior to its publication in the Federal Register. The hearing preceded Sheila Bair’s nomination to become chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FDIC’s McKernan wants single capital stack in Basel III endgame
Rebuffing Barr’s offer of a partial rollback, Republican director also targets op risk framework
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” activity in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale