Independent collapse highlights Basel II op risk insurance dilemma

LONDON - Some of the concerns of banking regulators about the effectiveness of insurance cover when operational disaster strikes a company could be illustrated by the plight of Independent Insurance, the UK general insurance group that collapsed in June amid suspicion of fraud.

Independent apparently had an insurance policy covering fraud and negligence by the company's directors, but there has been no early payout and the terms of the policy seem uncertain.

Regulators with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision have said they might accept a role for insurance in reducing the capital charges for operational risks, such as fraud, proposed in the Basel II bank capital adequacy accord.

But they remain concerned about whether insurance policies will pay out quickly

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here