Editor's letter
Systemic failure is a phrase we've heard a lot in recent weeks, whether applied to internal risk management at Societe Generale or the inadequacy of the UK financial regulatory process in the face of the Northern Rock debacle.
We highlighted concerns about investment banks' risk management in November in a feature on remuneration in financial services. It is of course understandable that greater emphasis is placed on income generation than savings, but as the events of January demonstrate, the activities of traders must be monitored - and, on occasion, tempered - by risk managers who actually wield some clout. Conservative elements within a bank will inevitably vex the sales force at times, but occasional tension between departments is preferable to the situation SG finds itself in.
One of the key observations in our November piece was that sell-side compensation should be based on economic capital methodology, rather than solely on performance. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was an internal credit risk management specialist at a major bank who said institutions should ask how much money traders make relative to the risk they take.
Another question is that of incentives, both in terms of the remuneration available to risk managers - the level of which will determine the calibre of talent attracted to the field - and ways of making traders more keenly aware of the need to protect their respective banks' credit books. No doubt the experience of SG will concentrate minds for a while, but the banks need to demonstrate that the avoidance of excessive risk is a priority for them, alongside maximising returns.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Citizens’ growth won’t bow to regulatory thresholds, CRO says
Risk Live: Bank faces stricter capital and liquidity requirements if it crosses $250 billion in assets
FSB promotes convergence on operational incident reporting
As global body proposes common reporting format, official says there may be an optimum time window
SEC’s Peirce calls for US Treasury clearing delay
Risk Live: Current timeline impractical, commissioner warns; proposes task force to steer implementation
BNP Paribas exec fears data drought from market’s IMA cuts
Vendors may not step up with critical inputs to support internal models under FRTB
Hong Kong rationalises swaps reporting requirements
Some duplicate fields removed, but framework still more granular than other jurisdictions
The curious case of the revealing orders
Oxford academics have found evidence pointing to collusion on a European exchange, but market-makers aren’t wholly convinced
FDIC’s McKernan wants single capital stack in Basel III endgame
Rebuffing Barr’s offer of a partial rollback, Republican director also targets op risk framework
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB