Copper scandal prompts SRB to ban trading
China is to ban units within its State Reserves Bureau (SRB) from trading in equity, foreign exchange, corporate bonds and derivatives, according to newswire reports in Beijing.
Liu officially worked for the separate State Regulation Centre for Supplies Reserve, but it later became apparent that he was in fact trading on behalf of the SRB. He has not been seen since the scandal broke, and the SRB says it is unsure of Liu’s whereabouts.
A deadline to settle the position passed on December 21, and metals analysts believe the bureau was allowed to roll forward most of the deliveries over the next three years. It had been hoping that prices would fall, but prices have soared after traders became dubious of SRB announcements that it had huge stockpiles to release into the markets.
Robin Bhat, a metals analyst at UBS in London, said the decision to put off payment could further backfire for the Chinese. “They have rolled forward presumably in the belief that the price would fall,” he said. “But it’s another bet that they’ve made and it could deal them a serious blow. We seem to be delaying the day of reckoning.”
The price of copper has continued to climb since then, and reached a record high of $4,615 per ton earlier this month on the London Metals Exchange – some $700 above trading when the scandal broke, adding to the cost of settling the position.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint