CFTC prepares to limit energy speculation
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may limit speculative trading in energy products and other commodities, CFTC chairman Gary Gensler said yesterday.
The CFTC will hold hearings in July and August on the issue. Gensler pointed out that the CFTC sets anti-speculation position limits for agricultural commodities, but not for energy: futures exchanges set limits to prevent market manipulation, but not to "prevent the burdens of excessive speculation".
At present, position limits do not apply to investors using the energy markets for bona fide hedging, but the CFTC might change this to include only users of the physical product rather than investors with a purely financial exposure through other positions.
Gensler said last month the CFTC would be on guard for another speculation-driven energy bubble as the world's economy recovered. The CFTC's energy markets advisory committee was set up in early 2008 after the Commission noticed an "all-time high" of market manipulation, false reporting and trading violations in 2002–2007. In July 2008, a CFTC report found no evidence linking speculation with the oil price spike, but speculators were widely blamed later that year by US authorities.
See also: CFTC targets dealers, leverage and counterparty risk
CFTC names Chilton head of energy committee
The blame game
CFTC dismisses speculation speculation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
As supplier risk grows, banks check their third-party guest lists
Dora forces rethink of KRI and RAF frameworks amid reappraisal of what constitutes a key counterparty
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2025
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
Regionals built first-line defences pre-CrowdStrike
In-business risk teams vary in size and reporting lines, but outage fears are a constant
Op risk data: Santander in car crash of motor-finance fail
Also: Macquarie fined for fake metals trade flaws, Metro makes AML misses, and Invesco red-faced over greenwashing. Data by ORX News
Public enemy number one: the threat to information security
Nearly half of domestic and regional banks report risk appetite breaches amid heightened sense of insecurity
Credit risk transfer, with a derivatives twist
Dealers angle to revive market that enables them to offload counterparty exposures, freeing up capital
Op Risk Benchmarking 2024: the banks
As threats grow and regulators bore down, focus shifts to the first line