JP Morgan backs TradeWeb launch of multi-dealer swaps platform
Thomson TradeWeb will launch a multi-dealer interest rate swaps trading platform in Europe at the beginning of 2005, and has received the support of JP Morgan Chase - the bank that dominated Risk ’s inter-dealer swaps rankings in September
To date, only JP Morgan Chase has confirmed its participation. But TradeWeb plans to unveil other backers in the coming months.
The platform's aim is to provide enhanced liquidity and transparency to investors, while giving dealers a better distribution network for their products.
Lee Olesky, president of Thomson TradeWeb, said the platform had already gained a strong presence in European government bond, US Treasury and other markets. “We do $125 billion a day with customers around the world, with around 18,000 users. We also have a successful track record with dealer-to-user platforms,” he said.
Olesky is confident TradeWeb's critical mass of dealers and buy-side customers in bond trading will help it establish a liquid multi-dealer rates platform. He says current clients include European central banks, and top asset managers such as pension funds and hedge funds.
The TradeWeb platform operates a request-for-quote (RFQ) model where the client nominates dealers on the platform, requests a real quote based on the indicative levels he sees and receives instant quotes.
“The request-for-quote dealing model is the most appropriate dealing protocol for the interest rate swaps market," said Ashley Bacon, head of European interest rate trading at JP Morgan Chase. "I would expect existing clients may trade more frequently and the client base will grow.” He added that TradeWeb’s advantage lay in its technology being well tested through the bond-dealing platform.
A Swapstream spokesman said his company’s business was currently inter-dealer only. “Our user board consists of market makers and brokers,” he said. However, he conceded that, in theory, there was no technical reason why buy-side institutions could not be added to it.
A September report on electronic swaps trading by Celent, a Boston-based consultancy, said there were still major barriers to dealer-client electronic trading: “Credit, pricing and product specialisation issues continue to impede dealer-to-client trading, and it appears unlikely that client firms will gain access to inter-dealer swap liquidity any time soon.”
TradeWeb plans to roll out its swaps platform at the beginning of 2005.
According to its mid-year 2004 survey, the International Swaps and Dealers Association said outstanding global notional volume traded for interest rate swaps grew 16% in the first six months of 2004 to a total of $164.49 trillion, compared with $5.44 trillion for credit derivatives and $3.79 trillion for equity derivatives.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
FX options: rising activity puts post-trade in focus
A surge in electronic FX options trading is among the factors fuelling demand for efficiencies across the entire trade lifecycle, says OSTTRA’s commercial lead, FX and securities
Dismantling the zeal and the hype: the real GenAI use cases in risk management
Chartis explores the advantages and drawbacks of GenAI applications in risk management – firmly within the well-established and continuously evolving AI landscape
Chartis RiskTech100® 2024
The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…
T+1: complacency before the storm?
This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms
Empowering risk management with AI
This webinar explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can strip out the overheads and effort of rapidly modelling, monitoring and mitigating risk
Core-Payments for business leaders: why real-time access to payment data is key to long‑term business success
Business leaders require easy access to timely, reliable and complete information across post-trade processes. Aside from the usual requirements of senior managers to optimise for risk, revenues and costs, they increasingly need to demonstrate to their…
Risk applications and the cloud: driving better value and performance from key risk management architecture
Today's financial services organisations are increasingly looking to move their financial risk management applications to the cloud. But, according to a recent survey by Risk.net and SS&C Algorithmics, many risk professionals believe there is room for…
Machine learning models: the validation challenge
Machine learning models are seeing increasing demand across the capital markets spectrum. But how can firms improve their chances of gaining internal and regulatory approval for these type of models?