SEC capital rules proposals provoke heavy industry criticism

Washington, DC -- The capital adequacy rules proposed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have ignited a flurry of criticism from both US and European commentators.

The new proposals, published in October 2003 (see Operational Risk, November 2003, page 1) were created by the SEC in part because the EU’s Financial Conglomerates Directive requires all financial firms to have a home regulator who performs consolidated supervision. European regulators threatened to "ring fence" US broker dealers if a new capital framework that incorporated consolidated supervision was not put in place.

However, banks, broker dealers and industry groups who have responded to the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here