Banks 'can save money' by complying with BSA

NEEDHAM, MASSACHUSETTS - Financial institutions that do not implement Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance programmes risk spending much more money to comply with punitive enforcement actions and penalties for inadequate anti-money laundering (AML) controls, according to AML analysts.

"The amount of money firms have to spend to comply with an enforcement action and/or a fine is many times more than it costs to develop and maintain a BSA compliance programme, and the fines will only keep increasing," says Breffni McGuire, senior global payments analyst for Towergroup, a Massachusetts-based financial services consulting firm.

In a research report: Pay Now or Pay Later: Anti-Money Laundering Programmes Offer Road Map for US Funds Transfer Compliance, McGuire, urges banks to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here