Quantifying operational loss data
Dear Sir/Madam,
Organisations that are in the process of building infrastructure to satisfy the Basel Accord may be driven to spend resources most likely to mitigate the compliance and not the root causes of operational risk (op risk) that result in operational losses.
For example, op risk loss data collection includes the gross losses that are posted to the general ledger in a specific time frame; there can be multitude of near-miss losses called potential losses that may be filtered from entering the loss history database due to benchmarking and reporting reasons. These near misses can be a catalyst for future operational losses. A potential loss can also be recognised as a key risk indicator for a particular business line if the frequency of its occurrence is on the rise in a given time interval.
Cash loss control and specialised units generally include potential losses in their database for a variety of reasons. These losses associated with potential risk events, if included in the loss history database, can provide Op risk analysts with data to forecast and assess major risks associated with business lines.
Another key issue is that the op risk loss data for benchmarking (available to financial institutions from outside sources) is not specific in size and income exposure. In other words, there should be a way where a bank can benchmark its data to the data of its peer group which is similar in size and exposure. At the same time regional benchmarking can be beneficial when understanding the overall risk exposure for a financial institution.
Most companies have their own standard op risk categories, which are derived from their corporate risk policy, and applied across the board to diverse business lines. The ‘one shoe fits all’ strategy is likely to fail in the absence of a clear-cut risk assessment methodology. Financial companies that are similar in scope in their risk exposure have from 40 to 2,200 risk categories. There should be a manageable number of risk categories established only after consultation with relevant business units. These risk categories can be linked to a business line according to its risk profile. Linking or quantifying these risk categories to specific business lines and op risk loss events data, can help op risk managers make sound decisions.
Haji Amin
Manager operational risk
Bank of Nova Scotia
ORX site Administrator
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…