Collateral damage

The rules of the financial game changed dramatically in 2008, with previously rock-solid investments turning to dust. Securities lending is one example - as the risks for this activity increase should pension schemes and insurers still get involved? Aaron Woolner reports

p12-menco-jpg
Philip Menco

"It's like running into the path of a steamroller to pick up a nickel lying on the road." With this stark assessment of the risk-reward ratio for pension schemes and insurers, Dick Cohee, deputy administrator at the Jacksonville Fire and Police Pension Fund, explains why his organisation has brought a halt to a previously mundane part of the investment strategy: securities lending.

And Cohee is not alone. Fears over counterparty risk following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September has

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here