data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4731/d4731cc6a1050048269dbaafbde58d7c0afa9ca7" alt="Risk.net"
Chairman of the Fed says Basel II needs to go to the next stages of implementation
Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, has emphasised the Fed’s support for Basel II, and urged that congress, bank regulators and the industry work together to progress to the next phase of implementation. Bernanke emphasised his belief that Basel II was vital to modernise banking supervision and best industry practice, and promised that with effective regulation, substantial benefits for the industry will follow.
In his speech to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s annual conference on bank structure and competition, however, Bernanke spent most of his time assuaging various industry concerns.
Bernanke stressed no fewer than eight times in his speech that the revised Accord will only apply to the largest, most complex and most internationally active banks, but conceded that even these institutions are concerned that the cost of implementing Basel II will outweigh the benefits. Further, US banks have expressed displeasure over the complexity of the upcoming Proposed Notice of Rulemaking (NPR). Bernanke argued that modern risk management is itself complicated, and that sound risk management under the revised Accord will eventually pay for itself.
Other concerns that the industry has expressed include unfair advantages to banks implementing Basel II over those still operating under Basel I. Bernanke assured the audience that changes made to update Basel I will mitigate any such inequities, but he urged firms to submit specific advice if the provisions to Basel Ia are inadequate.
The chairman admitted that the Fed cannot say precisely how much Basel II, when fully implemented, will affect a bank’s risk capital requirements in comparison with Basel I. Referring to the flawed fourth quantitative impact study (QIS4), Bernanke stated that some of the studies have been conducted using banks that would generally not be implementing Basel II anyway, which in turn produced imperfect results. Bernanke stated that as the Basel II implementation process moved forward, the regulators will be able to provide more accurate information.
Bernanke warned that despite these concerns, the system needed to modernise. “Waiting for a crisis to force change would be foolish; by moving forward now, we have the luxury of being deliberate in the development and introduction of a system that produces benefits,” he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
CFTC acting chair: ‘We don’t need a Dodd-Frank for crypto’
US regulator wants real-time market surveillance; focuses on rise of liquidity risk
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues
Basel uniformity fades as members defy dress code
Rule-makers diverge from Basel III standards, denting aims of comparability and fuelling fears over fair competition
Fate of US Treasury clearing deadline to be decided at crunch meeting
Isda chief predicts delay as clearing houses await confirmation of go-live dates
Value-at-risk models face neglect due to FRTB uncertainty
Some banks delaying material upgrades until timeline to replace VAR becomes clearer
CRR III hangs in the balance as member states push for changes
Top EU lawmaker rejects calls to water down capital rules, while others see room for manoeuvre
Looming US Basel endgame redraft sparks calls to save IRB
Experts say 20 years of data makes credit risk models more appropriate than standardised approach
Cool heads must guide financial regulation of climate risk
Supervisors can’t simply rely on ‘magical thinking’ of market discipline, says Sergio Scandizzo