CEBS releases report on current supervisory practices on large exposures
The Committee of European Banking Supersivion (CEBS) has carried out a survey of member states’ implementation of the large exposures rules. The report provides a review of the different regulatory approaches and insights into the proposed manner of implementation of the new and old options in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). The report also indicates where there are synergies and conflicts of practice between national supervisory authorities.
The report represents the first step in a review of the large exposures framework. “Consideration of the commonalities and divergences identified will form an important aspect of the next stage of the work. A further key step, which is currently in progress, is a thorough consideration of industry practices in relation to the measurement and management of large exposure and concentration risk,” CEBS stated on its website.
Due to Basel II requirements, CEBS found that the large exposures rules will need to be reviewed to take into consideration new market practices in the risk management of large exposures and the interrelationship between the measurement of these exposures in Pillar I and the Pillar II rules on concentration of risk.
CEBS is conducting a public consultation on Pillar II guidance with regard to concentration risk, which is also being addressed by the Basel Committee.
Click here to see the report in full.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness